Pratyush Chandra is an independent activist, freelance journalist and researcher. Email: pratyush@radicalnotes.com.. (Pratyush Chandra)
This year’s union budget has been touted as an election budget—making the opposition fretful, whereas government supporters are exhilarated. The government perhaps struck the right chord with the voters. To what extent this will translate into votes is not our concern. We will briefly assess the real impact of the single most crucial feature of the budgetary recommendations—the farm-loan waiver—on rural labour.
The
Under the Debt Waiver and Relief Scheme, all institutional agricultural loans disbursed up to 31March 2007 and overdue as on 31December 2007 will be covered. The budget proposed two kinds of measures in this regard: a loan waiver, and a one-time settlement (OTS) scheme.
The loan waiver will be applicable only to farmers holding up to two hectares of land. Under this plan, all loans contracted by these farmers that were overdue as on 31 December 2007 and unpaid as on 29 February 2008 will be completely waived.
The OTS scheme will be applicable to all loans contracted by farmers not covered under the first scheme. Under this scheme, a rebate of 25 per cent will be given against payment of the balance of 75 per cent. The cut-off dates are the same as above.
The restructuring and rescheduling of agricultural loans, undertaken by banks in 2004 and 2006 or in the normal course as per RBI guidelines, will not affect their chances of being covered by the above scheme. Further, “upon being granted debt waiver or signing an agreement for debt relief under the OTS, the farmer would be entitled to fresh agricultural loans from the banks in accordance with normal rules.” The implementation of the scheme is estimated to benefit about three-crore small and marginal farmers and about one crore other farmers. “The total value of overdue loans being waived is estimated at Rs 50,000 crores and the OTS relief on the overdue loans is estimated at Rs 10,000 crores.”
The Condition of Rural Labour in
If we understand rural labour as those who derive a substantial amount of income from wage labour, it will include not only the landless but also a majority of marginal farmers (holding up to 1 hectare) along with a section of small farmers (holding 1-2 hectares). According to the Rural Labour Enquiry Report on Indebtedness 1999-2000, a rural labour household is one whose major source of income is wage-paid manual labour (in agriculture or elsewhere) rather than paid non-manual employment or self-employed labour. Further, of these rural labour households, agricultural labour households are those that obtain “50 percent or more of their total income from wage-paid manual labour in agricultural activities.”
Table 1 shows the distribution of farmer households in
Table 1 Distribution of Farmer Households by Farm Size (2003) | ||
Land Possessed (Hectares) | Estimated Farmer Households (in lakhs) | Percentage to total |
<0.01 0.01-0.40 0.41-1.00 1.01-2.00 2.01-4.00 4.01-10.00 10.00+ | 12.59 292.87 283.61 160.60 93.50 42.58 7.75 | 1.41 32.78 31.74 17.97 10.46 4.77 0.87 |
Total | 893.50 | 100.00 |
Source: NSSO, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers, 2003, as used in GS Bhalla, Condition of Indian Peasantry ( |
Wages have become a major source of income for farmer households, contributing around 39 per cent of the total rural income. Table 2 shows the importance of wage labour in the rural economy. For marginal farmer households, this is clearly the most significant source of income.
Table 2 Average Monthly Income per Farmer Household | |||||||
Land Possessed (Hectares) | Income from Wages | Net Receipts from Cultivation | Net Receipts from Farming of Animals | Receipts from Non-farm Business | Total Income from All Sources | Total Consumption Expenditure | Wages/Total Income (%) |
<0.01 0.01-0.40 0.41-1.00 1.01-2.00 2.01-4.00 4.01-10.00 10.00+ | 1075 973 720 635 637 486 557 | 11 296 784 1578 2685 4676 8321 | 64 94 112 102 57 12 113 | 230 270 193 178 210 507 676 | 1380 1633 1809 2493 3598 5681 9667 | 2297 2390 2672 3148 3685 4626 6418 | 78 60 40 25 18 9 6 |
All sizes | 819 | 969 | 91 | 236 | 2115 | 2770 | 39 |
Source: NSSO, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers, 2003, as used in GS Bhalla, op. cit., (2006) |
Indebtedness among Rural Labour Households
As mentioned above, a majority of marginal farmers own less than 0.40 hectares of land. For them, non-institutional agencies are the most important sources of credit (See Table 3). In fact, if we count marginal and small farmer households together (that is, all those who own up to two hectares of land), about half their loans (49.7%) are from non-institutional sources, none of which the proposed loan waiver scheme will cover. Hence, the scheme could have a positive impact on rural labour households only if it affected loans from non-institutional sources.
Table 3 Incidence, Amount and Source of Indebtedness by Size of Holding: 2003 | |||||
Land Possessed (Hectares) | Total Households (%) | Total Indebted Households (%) | Incidence of Indebtedness (%) | Loans from | |
Institutional Agencies (%) | Non-Institutional Agencies (%) | ||||
<0.01 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 45.3 | 22.6 | 77.4 |
0.01-0.40 | 32.8 | 30.0 | 44.4 | 43.3 | 56.7 |
0.41-1.00 | 31.7 | 29.8 | 45.6 | 52.8 | 47.2 |
1.01-2.00 | 18.0 | 18.9 | 51.0 | 57.6 | 42.3 |
Up to 2.00 | 83.9 |
Author Name: Pratyush Chandra
Title of the Article: Debt Waiver and Rural Labour Name of the Journal: Labour File Volume & Issue: 6 , 3 Year of Publication: 2008 Month of Publication: March - June Page numbers in Printed version: Labour File, Vol.6-No.2&3, Labour and the Union Budget (Article - Debt Waiver and Rural Labour - pp 19 - 23) Weblink : https://labourfile.com:443/section-detail.php?aid=612 KeywordsPost Your CommentsCommentsNo Comment Found |